who are part of this political space we are convinced that today more than ever, it must contribute to the construction of a new political culture from the bottom left. We believe that this culture must be rooted in the vocation of synthesis of our experiences. Understanding that they can make to strengthen a common path that allows us to transcend and organizations to pay and the existing experiences based on the construction of popular power of which we are part.
Faced with these choices again, we Centre practices of certain organizations that favor the accusations, defamation and enforced boundaries between those who routinely bring to the social transformation, or at least tried to. For our part, we believe that these services do not provide a policy tool to transform the power of those who travel. That is why we prioritize political discussions in a constructive and fraternal, while so to say what we think and which are campaigning every day.
This matter is now and forever in your hands
... Before the open debate on the role it must fulfill our Student Center can be considered to be an area that contains the different political expressions, a reference for all students, a tool for coordination and organization that fights motoric the group to express themselves in transformative actions. A center to assume the defense of public education in all areas incorporating the dispute over the meaning of knowledge production and the social role of the professionals. To undertake this task, the Centre should be independent of the efforts of Time and governments to fend for himself and supported in its capacity as a political collective. This is not to repeat phrases: those who think that we have found in practice, along with other organizations and students are not grouped in the construction and foreshadowing the Centre we want.
Since 2008, an experience developed from below that enabled the problematization of the role of the Student Center, we believe that there was progress in building an inclusive tool-minded guild. Try, with their successes and mistakes allowed that the center can be understood as something that transcends his leadership, with a performance based not only on assemblies, but also commissions and the - and embryonic-recent experience of the body of delegates. We understand that the steps taken today allow us to consider new challenges, continue betting on space-based organization and the debate in our courses, so keep fighting in pursuit of our claims. Motorized areas and allow us to consider the concerns of the heterogeneity of those who studied at the School, along the path we have started to contribute to the construction of a student movement critical, active role. For this we say that this new process has not been recasting exhausted and must go further democratization of the tool of the trade union and students.
organized to fight, fight to win!
This election we are after one of the greatest conflicts brought on by the student movement in society, with massive assemblies showed signs of getting a cumulative force historic achievement for our faculty, which is fighting for the Central Building 14 years ago. Conflict calls into question the current educational model expressed in the appalling conditions submitted and the difficulties in continuing our studies at the University. During this fight, we had to deal with the authorities of the Faculty (Dean and Vice Dean Caletti Clemente) to address legitimate claims were only in response to demonize those who organize ourselves (for solutions, or talk). This student movement out of a cabbage, but was enhanced by the experience of the first quarter with the body of delegates that allowed us to fight the case opened criminal charges and two students of Social Sciences, initiated this by the very president Ruben Hallú (highest authority of the UBA) and the defense recovered from the parking space.
During this conflict developed genuine experiences and interesting discussions were opened: the self-expressing class questioning the student's passive role in the process of teaching and learning, and Construction of the dining room at the headquarters of the Constitution. There are signs that strong desire in the student movement to take the political life of the College in their own hands.
believe that was very important to the confluence of the common concerns in terms of prioritizing the interests of the movement as a whole. Putting at all times the need to promote unity and massive, growing organization looking to the students and managed to crystallize a collective triumph. This shared experience is what makes us think that the struggle and organization from below serve and that can lead to major victories. Because we value these types of construction, we believe in continuity and deepening them, is that we come together in this space.
That the tortilla becomes
Social struggle is part of the estudiantazo that in secondary, tertiary and the University, called into question educational policy while a youth revealed that she refuses to accept the established or "the best extent possible." A youth who returns to take politics into their hands as a tool of transformation, which is organized to fight, is the daughter of the process that opened in 2001 and breaks with the apathy, disinterest and the culture of "do not mess." We are part of this youth trying to build their own participation and transformation tools, refusing to accept the old trade union structures and policies. We reject the calls that try to tame this new generation of militants reducing it to an uncritical attitude and possibility. This view forces us to confront a government bureaucracy supported the PJ and the CGT, which attempts to install a polarization where any criticism would be "functional right." Without denying that some measures are a new floor from where to advance, we understand that these are not concessions of a government, but the institutionalization of historical struggles of the popular and the place from where the power reconstructs its hegemony. For all this we believe that youth should take an active role in building a transformative social force and the exploited and the oppressed.
From this perspective, we chose the University as a field of membership, because we are convinced that it is a trench in which we give a dispute over a free educational model, massive quality, but also by the social role of the university, which is understood to contribute to social transformation to paint the University of worker and peasant mulatto, as Che said.
With humility and perseverance we are building with this horizon. In these weeks we will discuss what we want to build center to which university and what society. We know we're not the only ones that we walked this way from the bottom left, so we invite everyone to explore it together.
THE BOARD - SOCIAL
counterhegemony - La Mella Young died from fighting, by Mariano and against the traitors
2. When a woman moves forward, no man back: the Juventud Rebelde at the National Meeting of Women 3. Contributing to the paths of emancipation, came the Battle of Ideas Magazine.
4. Before the death of former President Nestor Kirchner
0 comments:
Post a Comment